[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TeXtoIDL fix for IDL 5.3
- Subject: Re: TeXtoIDL fix for IDL 5.3
- From: davidf(at)dfanning.com (David Fanning)
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 08:40:43 -0700
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.idl-pvwave
- Organization: Fanning Software Consulting
- References: <owemabj2db.fsf@kracko.harvard.edu>
- Xref: news.doit.wisc.edu comp.lang.idl-pvwave:18463
Randall Smith (rsmith@kracko.harvard.edu) makes a good point
when he writes:
> (Note to RSI: Would it REALLY be that
> difficult to make all non-documented routines start with, say, "RSI_",
> so that we poor users could easily avoid them? And, while we're at
> it, all internal common blocks as well?)
In a perfect world, of course, all software programs would
be written with the end result clearly in mind. This is how
all of *my* programs are written. :^)
Cheers,
David
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
Phone: 970-221-0438 E-Mail: davidf@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155