[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: END statement
Reimar:
Yes, that's a bug in IDL 5.4. (And a real pain too, for those of us who submit
IDL jobs to batch.) Supposedly it'll be fixed in the next release.
William Thompson
Reimar Bauer <r.bauer@fz-juelich.de> writes:
>Hi,
>I believe there were some changes to the END statement done.
>idl < input > text.out
>where input is a shell script like
>.run test
>test
>and test is a script like
>pro test
> for i=0, 1800 do print,i
> print,'hallo'
>end
>In prior versions like idl 5.3 all printed text was
>saved to text.out.
>Now there are a lot of text is missing.
>If you change the 1800 to 300 the text.out file
>is empty.
>If we set a flush before the end (flush,-1) we got
>all print statements into the file.
>I believe in idl5.3 there was a flush implemented
>to the end statement.
>Reimar
>--
>Reimar Bauer
>Institut fuer Stratosphaerische Chemie (ICG-1)
>Forschungszentrum Juelich
>email: R.Bauer@fz-juelich.de
>http://www.fz-juelich.de/icg/icg1/
>==================================================================
>a IDL library at ForschungsZentrum Juelich
>http://www.fz-juelich.de/icg/icg1/idl_icglib/idl_lib_intro.html
>http://www.fz-juelich.de/zb/text/publikation/juel3786.html
>==================================================================
>read something about linux / windows
>http://www.suse.de/de/news/hotnews/MS.html